Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:36:40 +0100
with message-id <9b1fc629-4c58-4b65-95ca-8a55e210e...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#983233: New autopkgtest shouldn’t trigger a regression
has caused the Debian Bug report #983233,
regarding New autopkgtest shouldn’t trigger a regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
983233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debci
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
Hi,
I recently added an autopkgtest to a package, and the autopkgtest failed
on all suites. I’m surprised to see that failure considered as a
regression (#983211), so I believe there is a mistake somewhere (maybe
that’s just me not getting what “regression” means, if so that might
deserve being documented).
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi taffit,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:23:14 -0400 =?UTF-8?Q?David_Pr=c3=a9vot?=
<taf...@debian.org> wrote:
Maybe “failing test” since you used it twice to describe the actual
issue (but that’s two words) or even simply (test) “failure”?
For a while now, the text is "regression or new test".
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
