Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:37:25 +0100
with message-id <z9pmjbrbdtdhg...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1098765: transition: pcl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098765,
regarding transition: pcl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1098765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pcl
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
I would like to transition the pcl package to the new version. The only
reverse dependency is probably ros-perception-pcl (maintained by me), or
whatever ben comes up with, once it is there ;).
Cheers Jochen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-02-24 09:01:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 23/02/2025 21:15, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:pcl
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi release team,
> >
> > I would like to transition the pcl package to the new version. The only
> > reverse dependency is probably ros-perception-pcl (maintained by me), or
> > whatever ben comes up with, once it is there ;).
>
> Indeed. Does it build fine against the new pcl? If so, go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
