Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:25:58 +0100
with message-id <z9pjdny7csxq_...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1099894: transition:
addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099894,
regarding transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1099894: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnus...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-gnustep + src:gnustep-addresses
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Our intention was to do this transition together with the rest of the
GNUstep libraries (RT #1099081) but the package has been in NEW until
today. This is a bugfix release following a full audit of the code
inspired by #1087735. To cite the upstream announcement [1]:
,----
| AddressManager and Addresses Frameworks got a major maintenance
| release, 0.5.0. Highly recommended: code modernisation, highly
| improved encoding detection and RFC compliance for UTF-8, display
| fixes, memory and initialization handling, crash fixers....
`----
Both rdeps agenda.app and gnumail build fine against the new version.
There is no auto tracker because the source package was renamed from
addresses-for-gnustep to gnustep-addresses to match the naming
convention that was proposed to the FTP masters [2] and the rest of
the GNUstep libraries/frameworks in the archive.
Here is a ben file constructed by reportbug:
title = "addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libaddresses0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0" |
.depends ~ "libaddresses0.5.0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0.5.0";
is_good = .depends ~ "libaddresses0.5.0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0.5.0";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libaddresses0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0";
[1] https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?id=10726
[2]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnustep-maintainers/2025-January/006272.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-03-14 08:16:32 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2025-03-09 17:28:26 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > > On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Both rdeps agenda.app and gnumail build fine against the new
> > > > version.
> > >
> > > Please go ahead.
> >
> > binNMUs scheduled.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Please also file a RM bug to remove addresses-for-gnustep from
> > unstable.
>
> Done; #1100457.
addresses-for-gnustep got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
