Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2025 23:45:27 +0100
with message-id <z84ab3kwk3fra...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1099846: nmu: several packages to help the Erlang
transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099846,
regarding nmu: several packages to help the Erlang transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1099846: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099846
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 1069929 by -1
Hi release team!
In order to complete transition to Erlang 27 (see [1] for detail), I'd like
to ask you for a series of binNMUs. The packages erlang-asciideck,
erlang-base64url, erlang-cf, erlang-cowlib, erlang-erlware-commons,
erlang-getopt, erlang-goldrush, erlang-horse, erlang-idna, erlang-jiffy,
erlang-jose, erlang-lager, erlang-luerl, erlang-poolboy,
erlang-unicode-util-compat, erlang-mochiweb are not required to be
updated/ported to the new Erlang version, simple binNmu should be sufficient
for them.
nmu erlang-asciideck . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
nmu erlang-base64url . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
nmu erlang-cf . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-cowlib . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-erlware-commons . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
nmu erlang-getopt . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-goldrush . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
nmu erlang-horse . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-idna . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-jiffy . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-jose . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-lager . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-luerl . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
nmu erlang-poolboy . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
nmu erlang-unicode-util-compat . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27,
see #1069929"
nmu erlang-mochiweb . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
#1069929"
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069929
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-03-08 23:14:25 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Control: block 1069929 by -1
>
>
> Hi release team!
>
> In order to complete transition to Erlang 27 (see [1] for detail), I'd like
> to ask you for a series of binNMUs. The packages erlang-asciideck,
> erlang-base64url, erlang-cf, erlang-cowlib, erlang-erlware-commons,
> erlang-getopt, erlang-goldrush, erlang-horse, erlang-idna, erlang-jiffy,
> erlang-jose, erlang-lager, erlang-luerl, erlang-poolboy,
> erlang-unicode-util-compat, erlang-mochiweb are not required to be
> updated/ported to the new Erlang version, simple binNmu should be sufficient
> for them.
>
> nmu erlang-asciideck . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-base64url . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-cf . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
> nmu erlang-cowlib . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-erlware-commons . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27,
> see #1069929"
> nmu erlang-getopt . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-goldrush . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-horse . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-idna . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
> nmu erlang-jiffy . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-jose . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see #1069929"
> nmu erlang-lager . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-luerl . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-poolboy . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
> nmu erlang-unicode-util-compat . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang
> 27, see #1069929"
> nmu erlang-mochiweb . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with Erlang 27, see
> #1069929"
Scheduled. You can also send thos lists to #1069929 directly.
Cheers
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069929
>
> Cheers!
> --
> Sergei Golovan
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
