On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:08:40AM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > friendly ping on this bug. Is there anything missing to process it? > We will probably fill some more like this but I guess it is easier on the > buildds load if we don't do them all at the same time (which also allows us > to see if they actually fixes the bug). indeed!
> * Holger Levsen <hol...@debian.org> [2025-01-08 12:34]: > > Please schedule binNMUs for the following source packages > > on *amd64 only* (because this error type is architecture specific...) > Note that we only found those bugs on amd64 and thus need binNMUs there. The > usual rule for multi arch version skew should still apply. since a bit more than 24h we're also testing arm64 and armhf, so https://arm64.reproduce.debian.net/stats/#failed-to-reproduce:-1-second-offset-(#1089088) has 64 of those bugs already and see the same URL for armhf... these however will accumulate more cases as we rebuild arch:any on those archs. I also plan to file *new* bugs to request binNMUs on those other architectures. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Bananas are berries.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
