Package: harden-doc Version: 3.19+nmu3 Followup-For: Bug #1053602 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I would go further then just calling it 'low quality'; it's so bad it should not be shipped in a stable release IMO. I started filing a bug against ``apt`` which NEWS item refered me to ``man secure-apt`` which lead to Debian Security Infrastructure (https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-manual/ch07) and I was pretty shocked with what I found there. The apt package has been deprecating several things ... while this package and https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-manual/ are telling users to use the deprecated stuff, but no word on the non-deprecated stuff. In that bug report I ended up not sending when I found the bugs for this package, which kind of, but IMO mildly, describe the problem, I had a line which basically said "I doubt anyone even read the contents for decades" ... you know with footnote 54 saying "the stable, sarge, release" ... and several references to 2001 and 2002 ... SMH. IMO having NO information, especially as official Debian documention, is a LOT better then providing this .... - -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.10-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZ4/3GwAKCRDXblvOeH7b bozbAP4j7fooB4fF0X7wve0evIKHjYyRvwAfBoRUqxte/e36PQD/eF4nWoB3CjQU IYSwO93sQ+7nG978o11Fy3HSJFQZAws= =0t5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
