Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:12:10 +0100
with message-id <a2bacbed-14c7-474e-929b-7167c804c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092153: release.debian.org: Is riscv buildds fast
enough?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092153,
regarding relase.debian.org: Is riscv buildds fast enough?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1092153: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I love the idea behind riscv, but I am concerned about riscv's current
performance. As an example, the build times for gcc-13/gcc-14 on riscv
is measured 5-13 days, which 1-2½ the standard testing delay.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcc-14&arch=riscv64
This slowest seems unsustainable. Consider for pu-uploads, the deadline
for uploads are generally a week before the point release and this would
still not be sufficient for riscv to build the package in time for the
RT to include package into the point release.
This might be gcc specific problem or a concrete buildd being inadequate
(linux, firefox-esr, and libreoffice seems to show much better build
times). Nevertheless, I feel it warrants some analysis of the problem to
understand if this will become a problem for Debian post release.
Best regards,
Niels
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 11-01-2025 09:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
Though, as a personal remark, I think this sounds very promising and if
I was on the RT, I would probably consider this an acceptable position
for the Trixie release.
I agree with the assessment by Niels here. Let's close this issue for now.
Please keep on working to make those faster systems available as buildd
in the not too distant future by upstreaming those kernel patches.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
