Your message dated Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:09:52 +0100
with message-id <48c21805-1f96-4422-ac50-ff64086a2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RM: ocaml-taglib/0.3.10-3+b2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092976,
regarding RM: ocaml-taglib/0.3.10-3+b2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1092976: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ocaml-tag...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml-taglib
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
Could you please remove src:ocaml-taglib as well as its binaries
from Debian Testing so that it won't block the auto-taglib transition
as in https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-taglib.html ?
As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/1092688 , its upstream is
no longer maintained, and there is little help in solving the FTBFS
in the foreseeable future. I believe moving it out of testing should
be the best way forward for now.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 14/01/2025 02:16, Boyuan Yang wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ocaml-tag...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml-taglib
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
Could you please remove src:ocaml-taglib as well as its binaries
from Debian Testing so that it won't block the auto-taglib transition
as in https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-taglib.html ?
As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/1092688 , its upstream is
no longer maintained, and there is little help in solving the FTBFS
in the foreseeable future. I believe moving it out of testing should
be the best way forward for now.
Hinted.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
