Your message dated Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:42:52 +0000
with message-id <z35kvd25z0-hv...@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092470: nmu: ocaml-dscheck_0.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092470,
regarding nmu: ocaml-dscheck_0.5.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1092470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ocaml-dscheck_0.5.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
ocaml-containers version"
Hi,
Can you please schedule a binNMU to rebuild ocaml-dscheck against the
new ocaml-containers version in unstable. OCaml semantics mean that this
is a manual action.
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:30:32AM +0000, Kyle Robbertze wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu ocaml-dscheck_0.5.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
> ocaml-containers version"
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you please schedule a binNMU to rebuild ocaml-dscheck against the
> new ocaml-containers version in unstable. OCaml semantics mean that this
> is a manual action.
Scheduled (with a slight variation on your suggested command).
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
--- End Message ---
