Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:32:19 -0300
with message-id <a652e0dc-6f8a-441e-9847-980bd8dc1...@debian.org>
and subject line Mass removal of packages blocking ruby 3.3 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090911,
regarding Mass removal of packages blocking ruby 3.3 transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1090911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
We are about to start the ruby 3.3 transition and there are some
packages failing to build against the new interpreter that are not
needed in testing (leaf packages mostly). I'd like to request the
removal of the following source, and associated binary, packages from
testing to unblock the ruby 3.3 transition:
* ruby-nokogumbo
* ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook
* ruby-dataobjects
- ruby-dataobjects-mysql (please, remove it as well)
- ruby-dataobjects-postgres (please, remove it as well)
- ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 (please, remove it as well)
* ruby-grib
* ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention
* ruby-roo
* ruby-rgfa
* ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper
* ruby-puppet-syntax
- ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper (which is also in this removals list)
* ruby-puma-worker-killer
- gitlab (which is not in testing)
* ruby-mail-room
- gitlab (which is not in testing)
* ruby-hipchat
* ruby-googleapis-common-protos
* ruby-gelf
* ruby-file-validators
* ruby-cleanroom
* ruby-batch-loader
- gitlab (which is not in testing)
* ruby-api-pagination
* redland-bindings (orphan package)
The sub-items above are reverse dependencies, but there is an
explanation in front of each of them, telling why they can be safely
removed.
If you have any question, do not hesitate to reach out to me!
TIA!
Lucas Kanashiro, on behalf of the Ruby team.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I moved the content of this bug to the ruby 3.3 transition bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090913
Closing this bug.
--
Lucas Kanashiro
--- End Message ---
