Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 07:42:13 +0100
with message-id <z2kgrak1yemmo...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1089594: transition: pnetcdf
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089594,
regarding transition: pnetcdf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1089594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pnet...@packages.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pnetcdf
Upstream have now added an SOVERSION, previously we used 0d.
Only two rdepends: lammps and netcdf-parallel, both of which build
successfully.
Ben file:
title = "pnetcdf";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpnetcdf0d" | .depends ~ "libpnetcdf6";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpnetcdf6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpnetcdf0d";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-12-10 09:29:28 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 09/12/2024 16:24, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: pnet...@packages.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:pnetcdf
> >
> > Upstream have now added an SOVERSION, previously we used 0d.
> > Only two rdepends: lammps and netcdf-parallel, both of which build
> > successfully.
>
> Go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
