Hi, On 22-12-2024 17:45, p...@debian.org wrote:
Should I upload a new HDF5 revision with versioned `Breaks:` against these packages?As I understand it the failing test for fclib depends on libfclib-dev which brings the transitioning libhdf5-dev. This leads to an executable linked to both libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 and libhdf5_serial_hl.so.310, causing the failure.What is the best practice to prevent this?
Nothing really, this occasionally happens during transitions and we don't have an appropriate solution for this yet. It's similar to a smooth transition where not all binNMU's have migrated and some binaries link to the old and new library at the same time (e.g. via different dependencies).
I thought about adding `Breaks: libfclib-dev (<< 3.1.0+dfsg-3+b4)` to libhdf5-dev but it seems inappropriable because the binNMU number is not the same for all architectures.
Unless somebody else has a better idea, let's just ignore for now. Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
