Apologies if this is a dumb question ... On Sat Nov 2, 2024 at 6:35 PM CET, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > packages instead. We would like to get input from debian-boot to define > the relevant criteria so that the freeze is useful for them. We would > start with the following set > > packages producing udebs > packages involved in a minimal debootstrap > > In the following discussion we will simply call them "udeb producing > packages" but better wording is more then welcome.
In the (original) addressee list I didn't see debian-kernel@l.d.o but the kernel produces several udebs as well. So shouldn't they be included as well? > The list of packages that is involved can be found at [1]. > [1] https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt libgcc-12-dev seems a bit odd? gcc-defaults is at 14 and that's (currently) also the version used by the kernel. And ``apt-cache rdepends libgcc-12-dev`` didn't make it clear why that version should be included as well. At least to me. Cheers, Diederik
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
