Le jeudi 17 octobre 2024, 20:02:56 UTC Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues a écrit : > Hi, > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:58:48 +0000 Bastien =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roucari=E8s?= > <ro...@debian.org> wrote: > > Le mardi 20 août 2024, 07:11:13 UTC Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > > > On 28/07/2024 20:56, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > > control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Last reverse deps of lib magick pipeline is not really bad > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/708187 > > > > > > > > A lot of failure are due to broken package or does not use pkgconfig > > > > > > > > I suppose we could go to experimental > > > > > > Yes, uploading to experimental would be the first step, as I said on my > > > previous > > > email. Then we would need bug reports for packages that fail to build > > > against > > > imagemagick 7. Make those bugs block this one and use some usertag to > > > ease tracking. > > > > > > If you want this to be done for trixie, we need to move fast. > > > > Could we began with transition ? > > > > I have fixed a few package and I think it is ok. > > > > I am working with java team to fix jamagick > > to support Bastien's request, I created a wiki page as an overview of the > current status: > > https://wiki.debian.org/ImageMagick7 > > This page includes those source packages which FTBFS in the salsa-ci pipeline > that Bastien set up to test reverse dependencies of imagemagick: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/746158/builds > > Most of the remaining failures are packages which FTBFS for other reasons than > imagemagick 7. I have linked the respective FTBFS bugs behind the "other > FTBFS" > links. The remaining packages fall into either of the following categories: > > - not in main > - popcon below 10 > - has a bug filed blocking this bug > - dune-* (i believe those are false positives as i cannot reproduce them > locally) > > There are only two exceptions with which I need Bastien's help: > > - src:dx has not seen a new upstream release in 16 years and can be built > without imagemagick by running ./configure --without-magick Fixed in last salsa > - src:digikam FTBFS with "MagickCore/magick-config.h:25:10: fatal error: > MagickCore/magick-baseconfig.h: No such file or directory" -- is that a > missing dependency of src:digikam on libmagickcore-dev (which pulls in > libmagickcore-7-arch-config) or should libmagick++-dev gain a dependency on > libmagickcore-dev?
fixed in last salsa > > Should I be looking into the FTBFS issues in contrib and non-free as well? > > Bastien, I also created a MR against imagemagick's salsa repo which refactors > your rdep building construct, turning it from a manual selection of rdeps into > an automatic computation using build-rdeps from devscripts. You can have a > look > if you like but it needs a bit more work and unfortunately, salsa does still > seem to be stuck, so my work on that is stalled: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/merge_requests/1 > > Thanks! > > cheers, josch >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
