Hey guys,
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 01:49:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> (2024-09-13):
>>
>> So we are now there. linux/6.10.9-1 should now be able to migrate to
>> testing, no major issues were reported so far, and I think you can let
>> it go either with a hint or automatically to testing.
>
>Indeed, linux{,-signed-{amd64,arm64}} migrated.
>
>> In parallel I'm still working on importing other versions, 6.10.10 was
>> released and is ready packaging wise. But now I would like to further
>> coordinate with you.
>>
>> Would it be now a good time for planned d-i changes, sho should I hold
>> back the 6.10.10-1 and later uploads? If so, could you give me (please
>> CC me so i do not miss it) a ping when it is again fine to do an
>> upload?
>
>I'm trying to see if I can get everything lined up for an upload that
>would have a chance to migrate, which I think would be enough to unblock
>Steve on the shim* front.
Nod.
>We'll need at least #1081698 addressed (or someone from the release team
>happy to force debian-installer into testing despite the missing build).
>
>I don't want to disrupt anything else going on, and I don't plan on
>getting a d-i release out alongside that upload, so I'm not freezing
>udeb-producing packages; hopefully, if the build situation is under
>control, an `urgent` hint on my side should give debian-installer a
>decent chance to migrate.
>
>If Steve confirms having src:debian-installer into testing is sufficient
>for the shim* fun, feel free to upload src:linux as soon as you spot the
>migration. I'll try and keep an eye out and ping you once that happens,
>though.
That looks great for me, thanks.
>> Please let me know, and if there is something else I blocking you from
>> my side.
>
>At this point, I don't think so. Once we know whether the proposed
>approach works for armel, we should be ready for i386 (see other
>thread).
>
>> Once 6.11 would be released and we know it's stabilised in
>> experimental we would like to move it to unstable and make the way
>> free in experimental for 6.12-rcX, as the later is in particular
>> important to make 6.12.y ready as this is expected to be the next LTS
>> upstream stable version and so the one aimed for trixie.
>
>Alright, thanks for the information.
Nod.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Specialty
