Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.39.html
On 2024-07-08 07:26:43 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: gl...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:glibc > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.39. It has been > available in experimental for two months already. It has been built > successfully on all release architectures and most ports architectures. > The experimental pseudo-excuses look good overall. Please go ahead. > The current known issues are available in the BTS using the glibc2.39 > usertag: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=glibc2.39;users=debian-gl...@lists.debian.org > > gopacket has a patch available and I can take care of NMUing if it is > not fixed before the transition starts. > > For aspectc++, cbmc and rocm-hipamd, the situation is a bit more > complex. Those packages have issues with the types introduced on the > arm64 version of bits/math-vector.h. Those are guarded by clang or gcc > version checks, but the guards are ignored by the packages for various > reasons. A workaround is present in glibc 2.38, but it can't be ported > easily in glibc 2.39. I therefore propose to remove the corresponding > arm64 packages from the archive. aspectc++ and cbmc are leaf packages. > For rocm-hipamd, this also means removing 15 reverse dependencies. We can wait a bit for the maintainers to react and otherwise let's go ahead with the removals. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
