On 21 June 2024 at 05:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| On 21 June 2024 at 10:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| | Control: tags -1 moreinfo
| | 
| | On 2024-05-27 12:01:45 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > 
| | > Package: release.debian.org
| | > Severity: normal
| | > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
| | > Usertags: transition
| | > 
| | > GNU GSL 2.8 was released a few days ago, and I uploaded a new version to
| | > experimental was has now cleared NEW.
| | > 
| | > I checked my email folder, and the last time this happened (gsl 2.7, early
| | > 2021) we attempted an automatic transition but some things got in the way 
it
| | > seems. Help from Graham (CC'ed) was invaluable then,
| | > 
| | > I am easy either way: a formal or automatic transition works for me, so
| | > please advise as to what you preferred course of action is. The package 
has a
| | > fair number of reverse dependencies but rebuilds "should" work cleanly.
| | 
| | Did you perform test builds of the reverse dependencies?
| 
| Mo, how wow I trigger this?

Ok, now with more coffee and after an early morning bike ride:

  "No, how would I trigger this?"  Happy to help but will need a hint.

Dirk

| | If so, have bugs been filed for those failing to build?
| 
| See above.
| 
| Dirk
| 
| | 
| | Cheers
| | -- 
| | Sebastian Ramacher
| 
| -- 
| dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Reply via email to