On 21 June 2024 at 05:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 21 June 2024 at 10:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: | | Control: tags -1 moreinfo | | | | On 2024-05-27 12:01:45 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | | > Package: release.debian.org | | > Severity: normal | | > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org | | > Usertags: transition | | > | | > GNU GSL 2.8 was released a few days ago, and I uploaded a new version to | | > experimental was has now cleared NEW. | | > | | > I checked my email folder, and the last time this happened (gsl 2.7, early | | > 2021) we attempted an automatic transition but some things got in the way it | | > seems. Help from Graham (CC'ed) was invaluable then, | | > | | > I am easy either way: a formal or automatic transition works for me, so | | > please advise as to what you preferred course of action is. The package has a | | > fair number of reverse dependencies but rebuilds "should" work cleanly. | | | | Did you perform test builds of the reverse dependencies? | | Mo, how wow I trigger this?
Ok, now with more coffee and after an early morning bike ride: "No, how would I trigger this?" Happy to help but will need a hint. Dirk | | If so, have bugs been filed for those failing to build? | | See above. | | Dirk | | | | | Cheers | | -- | | Sebastian Ramacher | | -- | dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org