Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 09:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libma...@packages.debian.org > > > Control: affects -1 + src:libmatio > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmatio.html > > > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > > > Please schedule a transition for libmatio. > > > > > > I’ve successfully rebuilt all reverse dependencies against the new version > > > (currently in experimental), except gnss-sdr and labplot which are > > > currently > > > unbuildable due to the qt5 transition. > > > > Let's wait for the Qt 5 transition then. > > The Qt 5 transition is over now, so assuming those two packages build against > libmatio13, then go ahead with this.
It turns out that labplot FTBFS against the new libmatio. I opened a bug and submitted a patch that fixes the issue. Should I upload libmatio to unstable now and then NMU labplot, or should I give some time to the labplot maintainer to react? Thanks, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
