Hi Graham, Le lundi 20 mai 2024 à 11:25 +0000, Graham Inggs a écrit : > octave-fits FTBFS on all architectures (#1070956), > and octave-stk FTBFS on 32-bit architectures (#1069477), > would you please take a look?
octave-fits has been autoremoved from testing because we requested its removal from unstable (see #1070956). octave-stk has been autoremoved from testing hence it is no longer a blocker. Additionally, there were 3 other packages which were posing a problem: octave-ga, octave-queueing and octave-statistics. Those are arch:all packages whose autopkgtests in testing were broken by the new octave (but they have no dependency on octave-abi-*, since they are arch:all). We made source uploads for the three of them, so they should be good. I have a question: should we add a Breaks in octave against the old versions of these 3 packages, in order to force the simultaneous migration of all affected packages? I thought this was necessary, but the excuses for octave no longer mention octave-ga and octave-queueing (octave-statistics is still there because it has just been fixed). Note that the updated packages have a Depends: octave (>= 9.1.0). -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
