Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Benjamin
On 2024-02-14 21:01:40 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-02-14 14:48:49 -0500, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > I’d like to alter this transition request. Instead of transitioning to > > version 20230802, I’d like to transition to version 20240116, which > > upstream recently released. > > > > Is that okay? If so, I’ll upload 20240116 to experimental and reexamine > > reverse dependencies. If not, please let me know how to proceed; a > > 20230802 -> 20240116 upgrade would require a second transition, and I > > don’t want to create extra work. > > That's okay. There is enough time to prepare a tranistion to 20240116 > until we have finished the time_t transition. Since the version in unstable fails to build on armel and armhf and blocks the time_t transition, but the version in experimental builds fine, let's do this transition now. With the upload to unstable, please check the FTBFS issue on risc64, though. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=abseil&arch=riscv64&ver=20230802.1-2&stamp=1703403912&raw=0 Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
