Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:09:02 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067749: nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067749,
regarding nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1067749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:ffmpeg
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Manual (bootstrap?) builds of ffmpeg on armel, armhf seem to have been done
with libglib2.0-0, which is depended on by at least libavcodec-extra60.
nmu ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against
libglib2.0-0t64"
Thanks,
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-26 10:39:03 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> Control: affects -1 + src:ffmpeg
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Manual (bootstrap?) builds of ffmpeg on armel, armhf seem to have been done
> with libglib2.0-0, which is depended on by at least libavcodec-extra60.
It was an upload with the pkg.ffmpeg.stage1 and pkg.ffmpeg.noextra build
profiles.
> nmu ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against
> libglib2.0-0t64"
Scheduled
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
