On 15 November 2023 at 07:00, Andreas Tille wrote: | Am Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 04:49:01PM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > | > On 14 November 2023 at 16:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | | > | On 14 November 2023 at 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | | Am Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:23:06AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > | | > Most of these are not in Debian but I think we need binary rebuilds of | > | | > | > | | > irlba because of headers | > | | > OpenMx because of headers, a new upstream 2.21.10 is out too | > | | > TMB because of headers | > | | | > | | Uploaded yesterday since I realised the need. | > | | > | Thank you! | > | > I misread that, I think. So you updated TMB. Good. One done, three to go. | | Yes, that is what I intended to express. | | > irlba is widely used, OpenMx is big and I think MatrixModels also pops up. | > If you could do a sweep over those I would appreciate it. | | I'll happily update these as soon as possible. However, I'd like to | know what might be some sensible means to catch this quickly in future. | For r-cran-tmb the strict version checking in d/rules (which is not the | best thing to do according to the release team) was raising some signal. | | I'd like to clarify first, whether there will be some better solution | via some r-matrix-api before I upload those other packages.
I relayed information I got from Matrix upstream in private email which then also lead to the emails written to r-package-devel I already referenced: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010051.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010054.html There is nothing more at this point. But we know the remaining Debian packages r-cran-irlba r-cran-openmx r-cran-matrixmodels require a rebuild. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
