On 2023-09-23 10:16:20 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-09-23 06:54:50 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Le 20/09/2023 à 09:44, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > > Good. Please go ahead > > > > I've uploaded ocaml 4.14.1-1 3 days ago, then uploaded camlp4, ocamlnet, a > > few other arch:all packages that could not be binNMUed, and binNMUed all the > > rest. > > > > All packages, except the ones I had already spotted during my test rebuild, > > built fine on all release architectures: > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html > > > > scilab's status is unrelated to this transition; there are open RC bugs for > > the other "bad" packages: > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.14.1-transition;users=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org > > > > The following packages should be removed from testing for now: > > > > gmetadom otags xmlrpc-light mlpost ulex0.8 ocamlviz > > Removal hints added. > > Note though, that are also autopkgtest regressions: > > ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for coq-dpdgraph/1.0+8.17-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ > (reference ♻), armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), > s390x: Pass > ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for coq-quickchick/2.0-2: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), > arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, > s390x: Regression ♻ (reference ♻)
Those were old failures before everything was rebuilt. They are now fixed. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
