Hi, > Le 24/06/2023 à 01:29, William Desportes a écrit : […] > Great, #1041982 does not have much blockers anymore, maybe we can schedule > the transition then.
FYI, we had a workshop during DebConf with Athos in order to try and determine what other packages (and relevant blockers) need to be uploaded from experimental to unstable in order to perform this transition. So far, only the four following versioned packages have been determined as needed in sync with Symfony. php-symfony-contracts (>= 3) php-psr-cache (>= 3) php-psr-container (>= 2) php-psr-log (>=3) That led us to notice other packages will become uninstallable (due to the version constraints), or simply broken. A few more bugs have been open in this regard (blocking this transition bug), but roughly, the following end user packages (families) are not yet ready. civicrm (#1051988) kanboard (#1051989 and php-pimple) Laravel (#1051985 and #1039731, and php-faker) shaarli (#1039733 and php-slim, php-pimple) civicrm is not in stable (only recently migrated again to testing after a php-log fix, Dmitry CCed anyway). Laravel was removed from testing during the previous symfony 5 transition, Robin already explicitly agreed that can be Laravel can be removed again from testing until a new upstream version is packaged. I don’t know if there are strong opinions about kanboard and shaarli, Joseph and James CCed. Some bugs are still to be filled (e.g., php-faker, php-slim, and php-pimple), but it may already be time to raise the severity of the blocking bugs. Regards, taffit P.-S.: Pad used to track issues during DebConf. https://pad.dc23.debconf.org/p/symfony6 Athos may try to rebuild packages also depending on recent version of php-symfony-contracts, php-psr-cache, php-psr-container and php-psr-log in order to figure out if more package are affected by this transition.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
