Hello, On Thu 24 Aug 2023 at 09:36am +02, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sean, > > On 24-08-2023 08:31, Sean Whitton wrote: >> The only remaining issue britney shows is that its autopkgtest fails on >> ppc64el. It's a relatively harmless failure however, to my understanding. >> Upstream do not seem interested in fixing it for the time being. > > But why don't you disable the test on ppc64el than as maintainer? (Hint: the > autopkgtest spec has an Architecture field that understands negated > architectures). > > Our RC policy says that we consider *regressed* autopkgtest RC on all release > architectures (and ever failing autopkgtests on amd64 and arm64 too) [1]. Okay, if that's preferable. I understand that it's about regressions, so I was thinking that overriding that once means that failures will be ignored until the bug gets fixed, and then it'll automatically start counting again. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
