On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 00:01 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:21:40PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >> Well, .la needs to die, but I have to admit that breaking the .la > >> interface this late in the release cycle was a bad idea. So yes, I think > >> you should upload this (and would unblock it). > > What do you mean, "this late"? The bug was reported before the general > > freeze started, and the only thing it's reported to break is upstream > > versions of subversion. > > After a short IRC conversation with vorlon, I'm of his opinion - so > please do *not* upload the new -4 which is readding the .la files. OK. I ask again, as there's a new upstream version[1], which is a bugfix release only. The first is a security fix, which is available in the NMU, but with the new upstream version number users can be sure they have that fix. Also fixes a regression and a parameter handling. May I upload it to unstable[2]? If yes, would be the .la fix acceptable with it?
Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://www.webdav.org/neon/ [2] dget http://www.lsc.hu/gcs/deb/neon26_0.26.3-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
