On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 17:20:44 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mattia Dongili ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 14:39]: > > aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS > > due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned > > accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153. > > > > Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package > > build-depending on iasl is qemu which already includes workarounds so > > maybe -4 can wait (and never appear as there's a new upstream release > > available). > > I don't consider -4 as "required for release", but of course adding more > architectures that actually work is a good thing (and thanks to the > testcase we'll notice if something goes wrong). So, in the end it's the > maintainers decision, nothing special from the release team.
FTR, qemu does not Build-Depend anymore on iasl, so it's fine for now, it would be really nice to start Build-Depending on it again after the release, though. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
