On 2022-12-29 "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 07:21 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > removing spamassassin/4.0.0~rc4-1/amd64 from testing makes claws- [...]
> That's due to the arch:all build failing, which means there is no > "spamassassin" binary package in unstable currently when combined with > dak's feature of hiding arch:all packages that don't correspond to the > version of arch-dep packages. See #915948 for further details on > similar issues. > Looking at previous build failures, it looks like the arch:all build > has issues with IPv6-only buildds. I've given it back, so let's see > what happens. Thank you (and Paul) for the explanation. I did not get that "removing spamassassin" was talking about the binary. The retried build succeeded. :-) cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
