On 2022-09-19 13:28:21 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2022-09-19 12:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2022-09-19 11:54:36 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > This transition can be considered done, if we're happy with the > > > state of > > > rheolef reported by > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rheolef > > > > It's only done when the old mumps libraries are removed from testing. > > That's currently blocked by getfem and rheolef: > ... > > The both need to be fixed or removed from testing. > > I see it, thanks for the clarification.
What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
