Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
* Add upstream fix for FTBFS with recent kernel headers.
(Closes: #971161)
Test-only issue, I was able to reproduce the FTBFS on buster.
diff -Nru evemu-2.7.0/debian/changelog evemu-2.7.0/debian/changelog
--- evemu-2.7.0/debian/changelog 2018-05-26 22:01:16.000000000 +0300
+++ evemu-2.7.0/debian/changelog 2022-08-26 22:17:57.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+evemu (2.7.0-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add upstream fix for FTBFS with recent kernel headers.
+ (Closes: #971161)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> Fri, 26 Aug 2022 22:17:57 +0300
+
evemu (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/series evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/series
--- evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/series 2018-05-25 22:40:58.000000000 +0300
+++ evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/series 2022-08-26 22:17:50.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
0002-check-test-conditions.patch
0003-fix-python-startup-crash.patch
+swmax-test.patch
diff -Nru evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/swmax-test.patch
evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/swmax-test.patch
--- evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/swmax-test.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000
+0200
+++ evemu-2.7.0/debian/patches/swmax-test.patch 2022-08-26 22:17:40.000000000
+0300
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+commit 86a5627dbeac8d9d9bc34326a758d6a477e876e4
+Author: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
+Date: Wed Sep 30 08:53:36 2020 +1000
+
+ test: replace the hardcoded EV_MAX array with the libevdev one
+
+ Kernel 5.8 changed the value of SW_MAX but libevdev has a built-in check
for
+ out-of-range bits (it silently discards those).
+
+ So where evemu is built against a new kernel but a libevdev that hasn't
been
+ updated yet, our test expects bit up to the new SW_MAX while libevdev
+ discards all bits above the old SW_MAX.
+
+ Fix this by making sure the test and uses the same value of the
+ respective type max as evemu itself does.
+
+ Fixes #3
+
+ Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
+
+--- a/test/Makefile.am
++++ b/test/Makefile.am
+@@ -11,8 +11,12 @@
+ test_cxx_compile_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libevemu.la
+
+ test_evemu_create_SOURCES = test-evemu-create.c
+-test_evemu_create_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libevemu.la
+-test_evemu_create_LDFLAGS = -static
++test_evemu_create_LDADD = \
++ $(top_builddir)/src/libevemu.la \
++ $(LIBEVDEV_LIBS) \
++ $(NULL)
++test_evemu_create_LDFLAGS = -no-install
++test_evemu_create_CFLAGS = $(LIBEVDEV_CFLAGS)
+ endif
+
+ CLEANFILES = evemu.tmp.*
+--- a/test/test-evemu-create.c
++++ b/test/test-evemu-create.c
+@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
+ #include <assert.h>
+ #include "evemu.h"
+ #include <linux/input.h>
++#include <libevdev/libevdev.h>
+
+ #define UNUSED __attribute__((unused))
+
+@@ -45,19 +46,6 @@
+ ALLFLAGS = (WITHNAME << 1) - 1
+ };
+
+-static int max[EV_CNT] = {
+- 0, /* EV_SYN */
+- KEY_MAX, /* EV_KEY */
+- REL_MAX, /* EV_REL */
+- ABS_MAX, /* EV_ABS */
+- MSC_MAX, /* EV_MSC */
+- SW_MAX, /* EV_SW */
+- LED_MAX, /* EV_LED */
+- SND_MAX, /* EV_SND */
+- REP_MAX, /* EV_REP */
+- FF_MAX /* EV_FF */
+-};
+-
+ static void println(int fd, int flags, const char *format, ...)
+ {
+ va_list args;
+@@ -119,8 +107,8 @@
+ if (flags & BITS) {
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < EV_CNT; i++) {
+- int j;
+- for (j = 0; j <= max[i]; j += 8) {
++ int max = libevdev_event_type_get_max(i);
++ for (int j = 0; j <= max; j += 8) {
+ println(fd, flags, bits, i, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff);
+ if (flags & EMPTYLINE)
+ println(fd, flags, "%s", emptyline);
+@@ -177,11 +165,14 @@
+ if (flags & BITS) {
+ int i, j;
+ for (i = 1; i < EV_CNT; i++) {
++ int max = libevdev_event_type_get_max(i);
++
+ if (!evemu_has_bit(dev, i))
+ continue;
+
+- for (j = 0; j <= max[i]; j++)
++ for (j = 0; j <= max; j++) {
+ assert(evemu_has_event(dev, i, j));
++ }
+ }
+ }
+
