Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:56:08 +0200
with message-id <d5a8193f-3691-5bc9-6103-68af58173...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1016287: release.debian.org: autopkgtest 2 to 5 days
since addition of armel
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016287,
regarding release.debian.org: autopkgtest 2 to 5 days since addition of armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1016287: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hi,
when a package pass all autopkgtests it can migrate in 2 days,
however if it depends on an architecture that reports "Not a regression",
it seems that the bonus is lost and the package must wait 5 days.
The problem is that it happens when a package depends on a package
that is not available in a given architecture.
Specific example:
excuses:
Migration status for node-node-rest-client (3.1.1-1 to 3.1.1-2): Waiting for
test results or another package, or too young (no action required now - check
later)
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ Too young, only 2 of 5 days old
Additional info:
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK -
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/n/node-node-rest-client.html
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for node-node-rest-client/3.1.1-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass,
armel: Not a regression, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass
Not considered
Jérémy
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Jérémy,
On 29-07-2022 19:36, Jérémy Lal wrote:
when a package pass all autopkgtests it can migrate in 2 days,
however if it depends on an architecture that reports "Not a regression",
it seems that the bonus is lost and the package must wait 5 days.
That's by design.
The problem is that it happens when a package depends on a package
that is not available in a given architecture.
Unfortunately, that's indeed the price of that design. As we're supposed
to try and support all architectures equally well, I decided that's
acceptable.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
