Your message dated Sun, 19 Jun 2022 11:51:16 +0200
with message-id <yq7xlel1x4juw...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010409: transition: openimageio
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010409,
regarding transition: openimageio
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1010409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team!
I'm filing this transition bug report to track down the transition of
openimageio library.
Following the auto-openimageio checklist[1], here is the list of source
packages reverse-depending on openimageio and the results of the builds:
* blender_3.1.2+dfsg-1 => OK
* embree_3.13.3+dfsg-1 => OK
* olive-editor_20200620-2 => FTBFS (oiio-related)
* opencolorio_1.1.1~dfsg0-7.1 => FTBFS (oiio-related)
Both FTBFS seem to be caused by some changes in openimageio 2.3.x
compared to older 2.2.x version. In the specific case of opencolorio,
this is an old version that should be updated very soon, hopefully.
I'll file bug reports for those FTBFS and track any progress in added
support.
Thanks for your time and patience.
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openimageio.html
Ben file:
title = "openimageio";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenimageio2.2" | .depends ~ "libopenimageio2.3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenimageio2.3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenimageio2.2";
--
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-05-02 21:08:35 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Sebastian!
>
> On 2022-05-01 at 11:37 (+02), Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > None of the reverse dependencies are currently in testing.
> > Please feel free to go ahead at any time.
>
> FTR, I've just uploaded -2 revision to unstable/sid.
Let's consider this done. Rebuilds have been scheduled to the extent
possible.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
