On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > I have good experience with some of my upstreams where they supported me by > adapting their build system to enable building without the bundled/vendored > dependencies. Has this been tried? Would it be worth pursuing?
It has been, yes.
I was looking when Micheal reported a few bugs (after my prodding) to
get a few build issues solved (actual FTBFS when building with specific
build flags). Even those bug reports were completely ignored with no
answer whatsoever; the patches also ignored.
I'm led to believe the chromium team is not really playing with the
community at all, rather they are just following their internal bug
tracker instead.
Likewise, they are obviously not interested in supporting anything that
is not the official Google Chrome build (if it can even said they are
"supoprting" that).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
