Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:05:11 +0100
with message-id <yatcp6pmvahpr...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#979651: transition: libpodofo
has caused the Debian Bug report #979651,
regarding transition: libpodofo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
979651: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979651
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi!
PoDoFo upstream decided to drop in a new release today, and I've just
uploaded it to experimental (NEW).
Due to the very low number of reverse dependencies (5), and the fact
that CVEs do pop up every so often here (I'm referring to the fact that
backporting patches in the future will be easier), I'd like an exception
ot the transition freeze for this.
I haven't yet rebuilt the rdeps, but since the API didn't change I don't
expect any breakage; I'll follow up once I've confirmed everything's
fine.
Thanks for considering.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-01-09 19:03:34 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi!
>
> PoDoFo upstream decided to drop in a new release today, and I've just
> uploaded it to experimental (NEW).
>
> Due to the very low number of reverse dependencies (5), and the fact
> that CVEs do pop up every so often here (I'm referring to the fact that
> backporting patches in the future will be easier), I'd like an exception
> ot the transition freeze for this.
>
> I haven't yet rebuilt the rdeps, but since the API didn't change I don't
> expect any breakage; I'll follow up once I've confirmed everything's
> fine.
libpodofo migrated and the old binaries got removed from testing.
Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
