Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> 于2020年4月25日周六 下午8:27写道： > > On 08/04/2020 07:02, Yangfl wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > libwmf is released with package split, and old-style config script > > dropped with pkg-config file introduced. There are three packages > > needing patches against `libwmf-config': > > > > wv > > gimp > > abiword > > > > and two packages which should only require binNMU: > > > > graphicsmagick > > imagemagick > > > > I didn't do a test rebuild of these packages, because full rebuild > > would take too long time. The new version of libwmf should not have > > any API/ABI breakage, so I don't expect any ftbfs. > > It would be good to disentangle the package split (which due to the Breaks > will > mean we need a lockstep transition with all or most packages migrating at the > same time) from the libwmf-config removal. If you reintroduce the script and > the > rdeps build against the new libwmf version, then we can go ahead with this, > and > libwmf-config could be removed after the transition. Otherwise we'll need to > wait until those packages are fixed. > > Cheers, > Emilio
https://salsa.debian.org/yangfl-guest/libwmf/-/commit/a542eed89c98bde74d410f6ea07ab7a3be77ebab Readded libwmf-config into /usr/bin. If that's ok we can upload it to unstable, and the transition should only require binNMU.
