Yeah, that's what what I decided to do. Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jay Berkenbilt: > > > I'm about to release qpdf 10. Someone contributed an openssl crypto > > provider. Do you think I should build with the qpdf packages for > > debian with 1) only gnutls, 2) only openssl, or 3) both gnutls and > > openssl? Option 3 allows users to select at runtime but makes qpdf > > dependent on both packages. I notice that systemd also depends on > > openssl. My impulse is to go with option 1 (gnutls only) because I > > really don't see any advantage in the OS package letting users > > choose at runtime which crypto to use, but including both cryptos > > probably doesn't ultimately affect what gets installed on anyone's > > system since openssl is basically always going to be there. > > This seems to be more of a query for debian-devel, to be honest. > > Two packages do not seem particularly useful to me. Since apt depends > on libgnutls30, I don't see how an OpenSSL backend for qpdf could > minimize installation size. This suggests to me that you should stick > with GNUTLS for Debian. >
