Your message dated Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:29:26 +0200
with message-id <45dbaffb-008d-8489-01eb-4bc62a81c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#954661: transition: dpdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #954661,
regarding transition: dpdk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
954661: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: z...@debian.org pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
The new DPDK 19.11 LTS is ready for unstable/testing, and we wish to
begin the transition. It was already uploaded to experimental:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk
The reverse dependencies are collectd and openvswitch:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/collectd
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openvswitch
Collectd rebuilds without any changes. Openvswitch needs a new version,
2.13, which Thomas already uploaded to experimental and that is ready
for unstable.
There's no auto-transition tracker for some reason, if I understand the
obscure syntax it should be something like:
Affected: .build-depends ~ /libdpdk-dev/
Good: .depends ~ /librte-eal20.0/
Bad: .depends ~ /librte-eal18.11/
Thank you!
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 27/03/2020 14:27, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 13:32 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 22/03/2020 13:31, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> X-Debbugs-CC: z...@debian.org
>>> pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>
>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>
>>> The new DPDK 19.11 LTS is ready for unstable/testing, and we wish
>>> to
>>> begin the transition. It was already uploaded to experimental:
>>>
>>> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk
>>>
>>> The reverse dependencies are collectd and openvswitch:
>>>
>>> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/collectd
>>> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openvswitch
>>>
>>> Collectd rebuilds without any changes. Openvswitch needs a new
>>> version,
>>> 2.13, which Thomas already uploaded to experimental and that is
>>> ready
>>> for unstable.
>>>
>>> There's no auto-transition tracker for some reason, if I understand
>>> the
>>> obscure syntax it should be something like:
>>>
>>> Affected: .build-depends ~ /libdpdk-dev/
>>> Good: .depends ~ /librte-eal20.0/
>>> Bad: .depends ~ /librte-eal18.11/
>>
>> There's no automatic tracker because librte-eal18.11 has no reverse
>> dependencies. collectd only recommends it (via shlibs:Recommends, so
>> we can
>> binNMU it) and I don't see openvswitch having any kind of dependency
>> on
>> librte-eal18.11. Am I missing something?
>>
>> In any case you can go ahead already.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emilio
>
> Uploaded to sid. Thomas, please go ahead and upload the new version of
> OVS once the builds are done.
>
> OVS doesn't link directly to the libraries, but dlopen() them (or
> something along those lines). It depends on the generic dpdk binary
> package which pulls in everything that is needed for that.
dpdk has migrated to testing, and since there's no tracker for us to follow
progress, I'll assume this is done and am closing the report.
If something is still missing and needs action from us (e.g. some binNMUs),
please let us know and will look at it.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
