On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 15:59 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Note that currently the package is named as though it's going to be
> uploaded to buster-backports. The hope is to get it in through
> stable-updates, in which case it'll be rebuilt with a different name.
Small point, but I assume you mean proposed-updates (and then stable).
Use of stable-updates is an additional and exceptional workflow, which
starts with proposed-updates in any case.
[Yes, with the benefit of hindsight, different decisions {c,sh}ould
have been made on various naming decisions on the archive / release /
security sides, but it's where we are.]
Regards,
Adam
