On 28.10.19 20:02, Paul Gevers wrote: > The auto tracker now exists, but didn't add python-pattern. Is there > anything special that it needs rebuilding (normally python packages > don't need that)?
Not per se, it was only to be a functional test. > It would have been slightly better if your previous mail would have been > a transition bug report, as that makes following the follow-up easier if > it needs to happen. That would have been my next step :-) Seeing as this is an irregularly triggered transition, I wanted to first seek input for what else I might need to include in the bug report. Would you still like me to file one, if only for the sake of completeness/documentation? > You'll also need to do a source-only upload, as we're not allowing > binaries build by maintainers to migrate to testing. Thanks for the pointer, I was not aware of this. Regards, Christian
