On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59:58AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > From my side, the buster version is much more tested by me, as well as > somewhat "looked after" by the upstream developer (who, for example, > contacted me a few months ago to be sure it had a few patches). > > Updating the stretch version would also bring in a few features that > might be interesting for some users: > * ACMEv2 support (related, ISTR hearing LE wanted to retire ACMEv1 at > some point, so bringing in support for v2 into stretch earlier would > be a good idea)
It seems that I've been living out of this world. So, LE will disable new registrations at ACMEv1 starting next month: https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/end-of-life-plan-for-acmev1/88430/2 AFAIK there is no plan to disable issueance of renewing certs, but still, that's a breakage that we should fix. Either way, I don't think there is a need to rush anything to stretch-updates, even leaving that broken till the December-ish .-r should be fine. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
