On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:41:31 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I uploaded some mutter fixes to unstable after the buster release which > I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps for > 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:44:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I uploaded some GNOME Shell fixes to unstable after the buster release > which I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps > for 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point. The GNOME team is starting to upload GNOME 3.34 to unstable, so these 3.30.x updates have had as much testing in testing/unstable as they are going to get. I haven't seen any regression reports, either from testing/unstable users or after asking stable users to test a prerelease. Do these changes seem OK to upload to proposed-updates now that 10.1 is out? Early in the cycle is probably a good time, to get as much opportunity as possible for people to try them via proposed-updates. Please let me know if any of the upstream fixes are considered too intrusive and need to be reverted. Test binaries for amd64 which should be equivalent to the version I have prepared for proposed-updates (but with a slightly lower version number): https://people.debian.org/~smcv/201908/mutter/ https://people.debian.org/~smcv/201908/gnome-shell/ Thanks, smcv
