On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 09:26 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Adam D. Barratt: [...] > > Will 25.0.0+11~deb10u2 build correctly-versioned binary packages if > > I > > accept that one? > > Yes, both 25.0.0+11~deb10u2 and 25.0.0+11+deb10u1 work, I just > uploaded > the second because I thought that was the proper version > number. Sorry > for the confusion, this proposed-updates process is new to > me.
So, as it turns out, I should have accepted +deb10u1 after all, as accepting ~deb10u2 actually made things worse. :-( The removal of mips from unstable meant that there was no mips binary for the original faulty upload to have the same version as, and the mips upload was accepted. As such, there are already 25.0.0+11 binary packages for mips in p-u, so any subsequent upload needs a strictly higher version. The simplest solution at this point would probably be if you could re- upload the 25.0.0+11+deb10u1 package that I rejected in favour of ~deb10u2. You will *need* to re-sign the upload, as otherwise dak will reject it as it will already have seen the signature. The window for 10.1 closes today, so if the upload could happen as soon as possible that would be helpful. Apologies for making the situation worse. Regards, Adam
