Hi Bas, On 04-07-2019 10:31, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Since the upload to t-p-u is unlikely to accepted, a buster-pu may be a > reasonable alternative.
We normally don't add packages in via pu. As monit isn't in buster, a buster-pu isn't really appropriate. > If the stable update is also not accepted by the SRMs, that leaves > backports. I'm somewhat reluctantly willing to maintain the monit > backport if you don't want to main the package in backports. > > Are you willing to maintain monit in backports if the stable update is > not accepted? Once packages can migrate normally again (somewhere next week if everything goes as expected), monit will be back in testing and backports is a viable option. Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
