On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:18 PM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 21-05-2019 20:35, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi Shengjing, > > > > I have decided that I'll let golang-golang-x-net-dev migrate to testing > > do the binNMUs in buster. I'll leave the bug open until the rebuilds > > have succeeded to keep track of the issue. > > > > Let's hope for the best. > > Which isn't great. So golang-golang-x-net-dev migrated to testing. I > binNMU'd abci as a first package in unstable with +b32 and in buster > with +b23. However, the buster binNMU got lost although the logs say it > was processed. ftp-master don't know where the issue is and advice to > binNMU in unstable even if that means reverting other packages. > > At this moment I don't have a better solution than to proceed with > reverting packages that are used for building the reverse dependencies > of golang-golang-x-net-dev and make sure we get a sane set of packages > to migrate to buster together. > > This whole mess shows the value of the advice to not upload packages to > unstable during the freeze that are not intended for the next stable > release. It seems this is even much more relevant for the golang ecosystem. >
Ack, I'll start writing email to the Go team, and work out how many packages need revert. -- Shengjing Zhu
