tags 394283 etch-ignore thanks On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 07:17:16PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > I'm not sure about your policies in these things, but maybe this > progress already warrants an etch-ignore tag?
Yes, the below seems to warrant an etch-ignore tag under the stated policy. > "Theppitak Karoonboonyanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/27/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Theppitak, do you have any news on the licensing? Just for the record > >> and the archive, here's what you wrote to me in private: > >> ,---- > >> | Umm.. I'm currently one of the upstream maintainers, but not the > >> | original author, anyway. And it seems the original author has > >> | lost interest to update it for long (before my team adopted and > >> | maintained it). [Err.. I also need to update such info in > >> | debian/copyright.] > >> | I'll try my best to contact the original copyright holder, anyway. > >> `---- > > Currently, I've got a positive response from the original author > > (who is not working for NECTEC, the copyright holder, any more), > > and a verbal agreement from an officer from NECTEC to ask for > > endorsement from the authorized person. > In other words: There is progress, but it's not yet completely clear > whether it will actually end in a free relicensing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
