On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:34:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > No, I just like to know what we're trying to achieve before starting to > do anything. > > Okay, so the idea is: > > (a) move m68k from etch to testing-m68k > > (b) automatically promote m68k packages from unstable to testing-m68k > when the same version gets promoted into etch. > > (c) when, or after etch has released, make a snapshot of testing-m68k > called etch-m68k if possible. possibly simply include that in etch > proper if the RMs deem it to meet the release criteria. > > (d) over time, improve the promotion rules for testing-m68k to be > a proper m68k-only britney run with appropriate criteria for > m68k (for example, counting debian-68k@lists.debian.org:m68k-rc > usertagged bugs as release critical, or :m68k-non-rc as not being > RC in spite of a serious severity) > > Yes? No?
Wouter? Michael? Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
