Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 19:20 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > tag 926199 - moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Adam, > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:23:10PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 21:43 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > now that https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911925 > > > is finally fixed in stretch-p-u I think it's time to fix > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913641 in the > > > sense > > > that we conflict against the "broken" OpenJDK (and build-conflict > > > against it. So we can remove the "build hack" needed to be > > > introduced > > > in the +deb9u5 security update). > > > > How much has the upgrade path from current stable been tested? e.g. > > Good point... > > > what happens if APT decides to upgrade LO before openjdk-8 and for > > some > > reason the system does not have the security.d.o package installed? > > *Shrugs*, people should install security updates...
Sure, just trying to make sure we covered the bases. Sometimes we miss really annoying corner cases that users manage to hit right away. > Anyways: > > Seems to just work. Plain stable + apt-get install libreoffice > libreoffice-report-builder > (which pulled in default-jre) and then adding proposed-updates and > the > new packages (deb9u7) and apt upgrade. See attached log. OK, thanks. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam
