Your message dated Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:31:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#924399: release.debian.org: ros-catkin has a bug and
needs to rebuild one package
has caused the Debian Bug report #924399,
regarding release.debian.org: ros-catkin has a bug and needs to rebuild one
package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
924399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
I have detected an ugly bug in ros-catkin (#924395). It _only_ affects to
software that uses catkin and generates pkgconfig files (.pc) that uses
Boost.
In our case we have ros-rosconsole. The pkgconfig file is wrong. So, I would
like to push a new version of ros-catking and ask a rebuild of
ros-rosconsole.
Can it be possible for Buster?
Best regards,
Leopold
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf
Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:47:19 +0100 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
<[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> ros-catkin is uploaded and accepted. I wait some hours to ask for NMU.
> However,
> I would like to add that I found another bug related with the cmake boost
> thread
> library issue.
>
> https://github.com/ros-visualization/python_qt_binding/commit/0a4893791039d5c3f851ee7bc2de832209d52f6d
>
> It's not so critical like the other one because I have only found one package
> that this one makes an error, but the package in the archive is wrong. So, if
> you agree, I file a bug, and I can prepare a patch for the version in testing
> and pushed. I hope not to find more errors in the ros testing packages ...
>
>
> Leopold
>
>
>
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
