Hey, On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:16 AM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Utkarsh, > > On 27-03-2019 14:30, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Please unblock package ruby-globalid. > > > > Recently, there was a bug (#925178) reported against the package with > > severity: important. > > Did you see my last note in that bug? > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925178#21 Apologies. I didn't see it earlier :( Answering below. Care to answer it here? > ''' > On 24-03-2019 07:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > ruby-globalid (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > * Team upload > > * New upstream version 0.4.2 > > * Add patch to fix regression (Closes: #925178) > > * Drop patches that are merged in upstream > > * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 11 > > * Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0 (no changes needed) > > * Fix insecure URL > > Thanks for the quick fix for this issue. However, due to the new > upstream version and the debhelper compatibility bump this version is > not eligible [1] for an unblock for buster. > > Did rails 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1 break ruby-globalid or did it only break the > autopkgtest of it? I'm asking because this version of rails is fixing a > CVE's which we want in buster, but the autopkgtest failure (and the > freeze) is blocking it. > It was breaking just the autopkgtest, thus the regression. Everything else was fine. Paul > > [1] https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html > ''' > > > The package was in testing and the bug was reported on 20th March and > > was resolved in the latest upload, which was on 24th March. > > This also causes regression in the migration of rails' latest update. > > > > Hence, request you to: > > > > unblock ruby-globalid/0.4.2-1 > > Not likely in the current state. > ruby-activejob from rails is the only reverse dependency of ruby-globalid. Since the package is in good shape now, perhaps could be given an exception? And it won't be risky either since ruby-activejob is the only rev-dep :) Also, it was an RC bug at the last moment (though I understand the scenario here) :( Paul > Best, Utkarsh