Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2019-03-26): > As I mentioned on IRC, we can't "push it into stretch" without a point > release, and the whole point of this exercise was to avoid having to > schedule another short-notice point release.
FTAOD: That's exactly in line with what I think I tried to convey over the last few days/weeks, I'm sorry if I failed to get this point through. > However, assuming KiBi has no objections, it sounds like we can go > ahead with getting the -9 ABI kernel into p-u in preparation for the > 9.9 point release in a few weeks time. Assuming I haven't missed > anything, the d-i version in p-u should continue to be suitable for > installing stretch on armhf in the meantime (at least until the p-u > freeze hits, at which point d-i will get rebuilt against the new > kernel). Accepting the bump should be fine at this point, thanks and sorry for the wait. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
